<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Browser Wars</title>
	<atom:link href="http://simon.co.za/browser-wars/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://simon.co.za/browser-wars/</link>
	<description>Tech journalist, writer, speaker and broadcaster.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 13:01:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon</title>
		<link>http://simon.co.za/browser-wars/comment-page-1/#comment-73</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2007 12:05:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simon.co.za/?p=47#comment-73</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t doubt that many of the problems are my fault - my point is that it was working fine before. On all three browsers. And now it isn&#039;t :(

I don&#039;t usually validate my xhtml, just because I don&#039;t have the time nor inclination - if it looks right and works right in all the browsers I care about, then who cares whether or not it validates?

But now my opinion is changing - because if I had validated then maybe I wouldn&#039;t have this problem now...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t doubt that many of the problems are my fault &#8211; my point is that it was working fine before. On all three browsers. And now it isn&#8217;t <img src='http://simon.co.za/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t usually validate my xhtml, just because I don&#8217;t have the time nor inclination &#8211; if it looks right and works right in all the browsers I care about, then who cares whether or not it validates?</p>
<p>But now my opinion is changing &#8211; because if I had validated then maybe I wouldn&#8217;t have this problem now&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mark</title>
		<link>http://simon.co.za/browser-wars/comment-page-1/#comment-72</link>
		<dc:creator>mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 14:23:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simon.co.za/?p=47#comment-72</guid>
		<description>try fixing some of your xhtml errors:
http://validator.w3.org/check?verbose=1&amp;uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.simon.co.za%2F%3Fp%3D47

Specifically, IE7 is a stickler for good DOCTYPE tags, so make sure yours is right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>try fixing some of your xhtml errors:<br />
<a href="http://validator.w3.org/check?verbose=1&#038;uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.simon.co.za%2F%3Fp%3D47" rel="nofollow">http://validator.w3.org/check?verbose=1&#038;uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.simon.co.za%2F%3Fp%3D47</a></p>
<p>Specifically, IE7 is a stickler for good DOCTYPE tags, so make sure yours is right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

